Jerry Nelson Jerry Nelson's Profile Page

Jerry Nelson Jerry Nelson

0 Course Enrolled • 0 Course Completed

Biography

2025 ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Test Papers | Valid ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor: PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam 100% Pass

Before you take the ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor exam, you only need to spend 20 to 30 hours to practice, so you can schedule time to balance learning and other things. Of course, you care more about your passing rate. If you choose our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor exam guide, under the guidance of our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor exam torrent, we have the confidence to guarantee a passing rate of over 99%. Our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Quiz prep is compiled by experts based on the latest changes in the teaching syllabus and theories and practices. So our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor quiz prep is quality-assured, focused, and has a high hit rate.

PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam is a rigorous assessment that tests an individual's knowledge and skills in information security management and auditing. By obtaining this certification, individuals can demonstrate their expertise in this field and increase their career opportunities, while organizations can benefit from hiring certified professionals to ensure the security of their information.

The ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Certification Exam is ideal for professionals who are responsible for managing and maintaining the security of information in their organizations. This includes IT professionals, security managers, auditors, consultants, and other professionals who are involved in the design, implementation, and maintenance of ISMS.

>> ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Test Papers <<

Famous ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Test Learning Guide: PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam has high pass rate - ExamDiscuss

No matter you are exam candidates of high caliber or newbies, our PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor exam quiz will be your propulsion to gain the best results with least time and reasonable money. Not only because the outstanding content of PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Real Dumps that produced by our professional expert but also for the reason that we have excellent vocational moral to improve our PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor learning materials quality.

PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam Sample Questions (Q221-Q226):

NEW QUESTION # 221
In the context of a third-party certification audit, confidentiality is an issue in an audit programme. Select two options which correctly state the function of confidentiality in an audit

A. Confidentiality is one of the principles of audit conduct
B. Observers in an audit team cannot access any confidential information
C. Auditors should obtain the auditee's permission before using a camera or recording equipment
D. As an auditor is always accompanied by a guide, there is no risk to the auditee's sensitive information
E. Audit information can be used for improving personal competence by the auditor
F. Auditors are forced by regulatory requirements to maintain confidentiality in an audit

Answer: A,C

Explanation:
Explanation
Confidentiality is one of the principles of audit conduct that auditors should adhere to when performing audits. Confidentiality means that auditors should exercise discretion in the use and protection of information acquired in the course of their duties3. Auditors should respect the intellectual property rights of the auditee and other parties involved in the audit, and should not disclose any information that is sensitive, proprietary, or confidential without prior approval from the auditee or other authorized parties3. Auditors should also obtain the auditee's permission before using a camera or recording equipment during an audit, as these devices may capture confidential information or infringe on the privacy of individuals3. Therefore, these two options correctly state the function of confidentiality in an audit. The other options are either incorrect or irrelevant to confidentiality. For example, auditors are not forced by regulatory requirements to maintain confidentiality in an audit, but rather by ethical obligations and contractual agreements3. Observers in an audit team can access confidential information if they have signed a confidentiality agreement and have been authorized by the auditee3. Audit information can be used for improving personal competence by the auditor only if it does not compromise confidentiality or conflict with other interests3. As an auditor is always accompanied by a guide, there is still a risk to the auditee's sensitive information if the guide is not trustworthy or authorized to access such information3. References: ISO 19011:2018 - Guidelines for auditing management systems

NEW QUESTION # 222
Which two of the following phrases would apply to "plan" in relation to the Plan-Do-Check-Act cycle for a business process?

A. Setting objectives
B. Retaining documentation
C. Training staff
D. Providing ICT assets
E. Retaining documentation
F. Organising changes

Answer: A,C

Explanation:
The Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle is a four-step method for implementing and improving processes, products, or services. The "plan" phase involves establishing the objectives and processes necessary to deliver the desired results. This may include setting SMART goals, identifying resources, defining roles and responsibilities, conducting risk assessments, and developing plans for training, communication, and monitoring.
References:
ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Lead Auditor (Information Security Management Systems) objectives and content from Quality.org and PECB ISO 19011:2018 Guidelines for auditing management systems [Section 5.3.1]

NEW QUESTION # 223
Scenario 4: Branding is a marketing company that works with some of the most famous companies in the US. To reduce internal costs. Branding has outsourced the software development and IT helpdesk operations to Techvology for over two years. Techvology. equipped with the necessary expertise, manages Branding's software, network, and hardware needs. Branding has implemented an information security management system (ISMS) and is certified against ISO/IEC 27001, demonstrating its commitment to maintaining high standards of information security. It actively conducts audits on Techvology to ensure that the security of its outsourced operations complies with ISO/IEC 27001 certification requirements.
During the last audit. Branding's audit team defined the processes to be audited and the audit schedule. They adopted an evidence based approach, particularly in light of two information security incidents reported by Techvology in the past year The focus was on evaluating how these incidents were addressed and ensuring compliance with the terms of the outsourcing agreement The audit began with a comprehensive review of Techvology's methods for monitoring the quality of outsourced operations, assessing whether the services provided met Branding's expectations and agreed-upon standards The auditors also verified whether Techvology complied with the contractual requirements established between the two entities This involved thoroughly examining the terms and conditions in the outsourcing agreement to guarantee that all aspects, including information security measures, are being adhered to.
Furthermore, the audit included a critical evaluation of the governance processes Techvology uses to manage its outsourced operations and other organizations. This step is crucial for Branding to verify that proper controls and oversight mechanisms are in place to mitigate potential risks associated with the outsourcing arrangement.
The auditors conducted interviews with various levels of Techvology's personnel and analyzed the incident resolution records. In addition, Techvology provided the records that served as evidence that they conducted awareness sessions for the staff regarding incident management. Based on the information gathered, they predicted that both information security incidents were caused by incompetent personnel. Therefore, auditors requested to see the personnel files of the employees involved in the incidents to review evidence of their competence, such as relevant experience, certificates, and records of attended trainings.
Branding's auditors performed a critical evaluation of the validity of the evidence obtained and remained alert for evidence that could contradict or question the reliability of the documented information received. During the audit at Techvology, the auditors upheld this approach by critically assessing the incident resolution records and conducting thorough interviews with employees at different levels and functions. They did not merely take the word of Techvology's representatives for facts; instead, they sought concrete evidence to support the representatives' claims about the incident management processes.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
According to Scenario 4, what type of audit evidence did the auditors collect to determine the source of the information security incidents?

A. Verbal and documentary evidence
B. Confirmative and technical evidence
C. Analytical and mathematical evidence

Answer: A

Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth
A . Correct answer:
Auditors conducted interviews (verbal evidence) and analyzed incident resolution records, employee training logs, and governance policies (documentary evidence).
ISO 19011:2018 (Clause 6.4.7) states that audit evidence can be verbal, documented, observed, or analytical.
B . Incorrect:
Confirmative evidence involves third-party validation, which was not explicitly mentioned.
C . Incorrect:
Mathematical analysis was not conducted in this audit.
Relevant Standard Reference:
ISO 19011:2018 Clause 6.4.7 (Audit Evidence Collection Methods)

NEW QUESTION # 224
You are an experienced ISMS audit team leader conducting a third-party surveillance audit of an internet services provider. You are reviewing the organization's risk assessment processes for conformity with ISO/IEC 27001:2022.
Which three of the following audit findings would prompt you to raise a nonconformity report?

A. The organisation is treating information security risks in the order in which they are identified
B. The organisation's information security risk assessment process suggests each risk is allocated a risk owner
C. The organisation has not used RAG (Red, Amber, Green) to classify its' information security risks. Instead, it has used a smiling emoji, a neutral face emoji and a sad face emoji
D. The organisation's risk assessment criteria have not been reviewed and approved by top management
E. The organisation has assessed the probability of all of its information security risks as either 0%, 25%, 50%, 75% or 100%
F. There is a different system in place for assessing operational information security risks and for assessing strategic information security risks
G. The organisation's information security risk assessment process is based solely on an assessment of the impact of each risk
H. Both systems contain additional information security risks which are not associated with preserving the confidentiality, integrity and accessibility of information

Answer: A,D,G

Explanation:
The three audit findings that would prompt you to raise a nonconformity report are:
* The organisation is treating information security risks in the order in which they are identified
* The organisation's risk assessment criteria have not been reviewed and approved by top management
* The organisation's information security risk assessment process is based solely on an assessment of the impact of each risk According to ISO/IEC 27001:2022, clause 6.1.2, the organisation must establish and maintain an information security risk management process that is consistent with the organisation's context and aligned with its overall risk management approach1. This process must include the following steps:
* Establishing the risk assessment criteria, which must be approved by top management and reflect the organisation's risk appetite and objectives2
* Identifying the information security risks, which must consider the assets, threats, vulnerabilities, impacts, and likelihoods3
* Analysing the information security risks, which must determine the levels of risk and compare them with the risk criteria4
* Evaluating the information security risks, which must prioritise the risks and decide whether they need treatment or not5 Therefore, the audit findings B, E, and F indicate that the organisation is not following the required steps of the information security risk management process, and thus are nonconformities with the standard.
The other audit findings are not necessarily nonconformities, as they may be acceptable depending on the organisation's context and justification. For example:
* Audit finding A may be acceptable if the organisation has identified and treated the additional information security risks that are relevant to its scope and objectives, and has documented the rationale for doing so6
* Audit finding C may be acceptable if the organisation has assigned clear roles and responsibilities for the information security risk management process, and has ensured that the risk owners have the authority and competence to manage the risks7
* Audit finding D may be acceptable if the organisation has defined and communicated the meaning and implications of the emoji-based risk classification, and has ensured that it is consistent with the risk criteria and the risk treatment process8
* Audit finding G may be acceptable if the organisation has justified the use of discrete values for the probability of the information security risks, and has ensured that they are realistic and consistent with the risk criteria and the risk analysis method9
* Audit finding H may be acceptable if the organisation has established and maintained different systems for assessing operational and strategic information security risks, and has ensured that they are integrated and aligned with the overall risk management approach and the ISMS objectives10

NEW QUESTION # 225
After completing Stage 1 and in preparation for a Stage 2 initial certification audit, the auditee informs the audit team leader that they wish to extend the audit scope to include two additional sites that have recently been acquired by the organisation.
Considering this information, what action would you expect the audit team leader to take?

A. Increase the length of the Stage 2 audit to include the extra sites
B. Arrange to complete a remote Stage 1 audit of the two sites using a video conferencing platform
C. Obtain information about the additional sites to inform the individual(s) managing the audit programme
D. Inform the auditee that the audit team leader accepts the request

Answer: C

Explanation:
According to the PECB Candidate Handbook for ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor, the audit team leader should obtain information about the additional sites to inform the individual(s) managing the audit programme, as this may affect the audit objectives, scope, criteria, duration, resources, and risks. The audit team leader should also review the audit plan and make any necessary adjustments in consultation with the auditee and the audit client1. References: 1: PECB Candidate Handbook for ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor, page 27, section 4.3.2.2.

NEW QUESTION # 226
......

Taking practice exams teaches you time management so you can pass the PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam (ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor) exam. ExamDiscuss's ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor practice exam makes an image of a real-based examination which is helpful for you to not feel much pressure when you are giving the final examination. You can give unlimited practice tests and improve yourself daily to achieve your desired destination.

Reliable ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Test Sample: https://www.examdiscuss.com/PECB/exam/ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor/